Today we are going to start our first round of our debate tournament!!!!!
Good luck!
Mr. F
Monday, 30 March 2015
Thursday, 26 March 2015
Rubric
|
Exceeds the Standard
|
Meets the Standard
|
Needs Improvement
|
Not Evident
|
Thesis Statement, Ideas,
Defining your argument, backing up your argument with proof
|
Ideas are fresh and
original. Thesis is narrow and
manageable. Order of development clear and precise and helps development one
clear main idea. Hook and thesis
connect. Clear important details for
support
|
Ideas are clear but might
be overused. Topic/ Thesis is fairly
board. Order of develop may ramble and
may not back up thesis. Hook is present
but may not connect with thesis.
Support is attempted but not quite fulfilled with specifics.
|
Paper lacks a central idea
or purpose. Ideas are not developed or
seem to go in several directions.
Information is limited or unclear.
Details are missing.
|
Not Evident
|
Organization
|
Original title.
Transitions connect main
ideas. Effective opening and ending.
Easy to follow. Important ideas
stand out. Clear beginning, middle and
end. Details fit where placed.
|
Appropriate title. Transitions connect sentence to sentence
but not necessary idea to idea. Good
beginning. Attempted ending. Logical sequencing. Key ideas are beginning to surface. Readable.
|
Paper is hard to follow
because transitions are weak or absent.
There is no clear beginning or ending.
Ideas may not fit together or ramble.
Paragraph structure might not be evident.
|
Not Evident
|
Voice
|
Point of view is evident
Clear sense of audience
Enthusiastic about
topic. Says more than is
expected. Words elicit both ideas and
emotions. Work is engaging and
persuades
|
Personal treatment of
standard topic. Perspective becomes
evident. Some sense of audience. Conveys ideas to reader. The writer likes the topic, but is not
passionate about it. Writing persuades
in some places
|
Paper is lifeless,
mechanic, stilted. Predictable
treatment of topic. Energy
lacking. Audience could be
anyone. Writer is indifferent to the
topic. Does not persuade at all.
|
Not evident
|
Word Choice
|
Precise, fresh, original
words. Vivid images. Avoids repetitions, clichés,
vagueness. Use of figurative
language. Everyday words are used
well.
|
Uses favorite words
correctly. Experiments with new
words. Attempts to use descriptive
words to create images.
|
Ordinary and recognizable
words. Language is generic or cliché. Uses repetitions or relies on slang. Overuse of “to be” verbs.
|
Not Evident
|
Sentence Fluency
|
Consistent use of sentence
variety. Sentence structure is correct
and creative. Varied beginnings,
varied structures, and varied lengths.
Natural flow and rhythm.
Writing is not wordy.
|
Sentences are usually
correct, but some may not flow smoothly.
Simple and compound sentences are present. Varied beginning. Sections have rhythm and flow. Writing could be cut to avoid wordiness.
|
Sentences are choppy, incomplete,
rambling or awkward. Meanings are not
always clear. Words are strung
together. Sentences could be extremely
wordy.
|
Not Evident
|
Mechanics
|
There may be occasional
errors in mechanics (spelling, fragments, run-ons, punctuation,
capitalization, usage, etc.). However,
it is hard to find errors.
|
Errors in writing mechanics
are noticeable but do not impair readability.
|
Numerous errors in usage,
grammar, spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation distract reader and
impair readability.
|
Not Evident
|
Uses of Persuasive Tools
|
Uses 4 or more tools:
expert testimony, quality of reasoning, points out flaws in opposing views,
appeal to audience self-interests, radically different topics or new twists
on old topics
|
Uses 2-3 tools.
|
Relies heavily on one tool.
|
Not Evident
|
References and Sources
|
More
than five sources. All sources of
information are noted in correct in-text citation (MLA format) and correct
Works Cited page.
|
Three
to five sources. Some sources of information are noted incorrectly or not in
MLA format. Minor problems with Works
Cited page.
|
Less than three
sources. Most information noted
incorrectly. MLA format completely
missing. Many problems with Works
Cited page.
|
Not Evident
|
Wednesday, 25 March 2015
Wednesday
Today we are going to review the notes you took and then watch a National Debate and fill out a FLOW CHART!
Does anyone have their debate topics?
Does anyone have their debate topics?
Tuesday, 24 March 2015
Persuasive Essays
Today we are going to finish taking notes, apply your notes to an Oration, and set up your debate tournament.
Debates - you will receive ten points for a debate with a good constructive and rebuttal, eight points for a debate with a good constructive and poor rebuttal. Once you lose you will be required to keep a flow chart of the debates. Winner wins 10 panther bucks and 10 extra credit points.
Debates - you will receive ten points for a debate with a good constructive and rebuttal, eight points for a debate with a good constructive and poor rebuttal. Once you lose you will be required to keep a flow chart of the debates. Winner wins 10 panther bucks and 10 extra credit points.
Friday, 20 March 2015
Persuasive Essays
Unit
Learning goal: Students will be able to research, write and perform an
original persuasive essay that takes a side on an issue and successfully argues
for that side.
Scale/Rubric
relating to learning goal:
4 – The student can write and perform an original persuasive
speech that that takes a side on an issue and successfully argues for that side
using all six elements of persuasion.
The writing and performance are both exemplarily effective.
3 – The student is able to write an original and perform
an original persuasive essay that takes a side on an issue and successfully
argues for that side.
2 – With some direction/help from the teacher the student
is able to write and perform an original persuasive essay that takes a side on
an issue and/or successfully argues for that side.
1 – Even with help
from the teacher the student is unable to write and/or perform an original
persuasive essay that takes a side on an issue and successfully argues for that
side.
OBJECTIVES: By the end of this unit students will be able to
1) Define the following terms: Logos, Ethos, Pathos, Thesis Statement, Order of Development, Conclusion, Transition, Audience, Hook, Purpose, Evidence
2) List the six traits of writing and the six steps in the writing process.
3) Properly outline the constructive for a debate and rebut opponents points/arguments
4) Participate in Spar and Forum debate
5) Watch a national debate and evaluate and explain who won by keeping a flow chart of arguments and rebuttals
6) Choose a topic about a controversial issues and take one side of argument
7) List the Do’s and Don’ts of persuasive argument
8) Write a clear and precise thesis statement with an order of development
9) Properly cite sources both in-text and on a works cited page
10) Find evidence from a variety of different sources including Print Sources, Internet Sources, Media Sources, and Personal Sources
11) Use the Internet to properly to conduct research
12) Create at least 10 Bibliography citations and 10 research entries
13) Use research notes to cite passages from sources
14) Use evidence to back up your position
15) Use your order of development as an organizational tool
16) Use transitions to connect points of argument
17) Use Standard Edited American English
18) Use Proper College Composition Format
19) Use the six steps of the writing process to draft and revise a paper
20) Write three drafts of a persuasive essay using at least three sources of evidence
21) Present the final draft of your essay as an oration to class
First - let's look at an oration:
Wednesday, 11 March 2015
Monday, 9 March 2015
Tuesday and Wednesday
Class Work - if I'm not in school.
Tuesday – work on essays (we went over these on Monday. Students should be revising them.
Wednesday – Take practice test
Tuesday – work on essays (we went over these on Monday. Students should be revising them.
Wednesday – Take practice test
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)